Abuse of authority
Disciplinary measure or sanction
Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
Facts (establishment of) / evidence
Proportionality of sanction
Due process
Credibility assessment
Confidentiality
Disciplinary matters / misconduct
Evidence
Procedure (first instance and UNAT)
At the outset, the Appeals Tribunal noted that Ms. Monasebian had provided little or no reason in support of her request for the anonymization of the Judgment other than a general statement that the information in her case was sensitive. The Appeals Tribunal took the view that anonymization was not warranted in this case and dismissed her request.
The Appeals Tribunal was satisfied that the UNDT did not err in finding that there was a preponderance of the evidence that Ms. Monasebian had engaged in a pattern of conduct through which she created an intimidating, hostile and/or offensive work...