91Â鶹ÌìÃÀ

2015-UNAT-497, Chaaban

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered two applications, one for correction and one for revision, relating to judgment No. 2013-UNAT-363. UNAT held that Mr Chaaban failed to show any clerical or arithmetical mistake to justify the correction of the judgment. UNAT held that Mr Chaaban failed to identify any decisive fact unknown at the time of the judgment to warrant its revision. UNAT dismissed both applications.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

In judgment No. 2013-UNAT-363, UNAT affirmed the UNRWA DT’s time-bar finding. UNAT held that Mr Chaaban did not allege any special circumstances that had prevented him from submitting a timely application, but argued that UNRWA DT should have waived the time limit for his application given that it had done so, for a much longer period of time, with respect to the Commissioner-General’s late reply.

Legal Principle(s)

An application seeking review of a final judgment rendered by UNAT can only succeed it if fulfils the strict and exceptional criteria established under its Statute.

Outcome
Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Chaaban
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type