91Â鶹ÌìÃÀ

UNDT/2009/066, Parker

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNDT preliminarily held that only facts occurred from early 2005 to 7 November 2007 were to be taken into consideration with regard to the allegations of harassment leveled by the Applicant. Consequently, reported actions and decisions dating back to 2004, in particular the non-promotion of the Applicant in 2004, were excluded from the present Judgment. Regarding the remainder of the application, UNDT held that the Applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his allegations that he was subjected to harassment by the Organization and that the latter bore responsibility for having failed to take adequate measures on his harassment allegations. UNDT accordingly rejected the request for compensation.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant alleged harassment on part of various persons in UNHCR, specially by the Chief, DEHA, related to his non-promotion, which escalated to nonassignment of work to the Applicant, as well as a number of subsequent decisions, namely; advertising his post as Senior Desk Officer without prior notification or consultation in September 2005; discontinuation of his post and lien on 31 March 2006 without prior notification or consultation, being only informed in May 2006; discontinuation of his temporary assignment in May 2006 without any notice or consultation; and belated delivery of his ten-year service recognition certificate, which was found after the office of the Director of the Africa Bureau was cleaned upon his retirement, 15 months after the issuance of the certificate. The Applicant requested compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

Every staff member is entitled to be given the opportunity to discharge the duties incumbent on him or her, and this includes being allocated sufficient and appropriate tasks. The burden of providing convincing evidence of harassment, prejudice or any kind of improper motivations rests with the Applicant who alleges so.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.