91鶹

UNDT/2023/095, Rodriguez Santorum

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

With reference to the relevant legal framework, no matter what status is given to the Applicant’s previous and/or current employment with the IOM in the context of the ASHI scheme, at the relevant time of applying for ASHI, the Applicant was not within a time period of 31 days before or after separation when an application for ASHI must be submitted.

Accordingly, even if the terms of the contested decision were misleading, the Applicant had no right to be enrolled in the ASHI scheme when he applied for it.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The rejection of the Applicant request for after-service health insurance (“ASHI”) by the Health and Life Insurance Section (“HLIS”) in the United Nations Secretariat.

Legal Principle(s)

The Tribunal notes that under art. 7.1 of ST/AI/2007/3, an application for ASHI “may be submitted to the office administering the after-service health insurance plan up to 31 days prior to separation but no later than 31 days following the date of separation”. Article 65 of ST/IC/2022/9 further specifies that, “Staff members are reminded that, among the eligibility requirements for after service health insurance coverage, the applicant must be enrolled in a United Nations scheme at the time of separation from service. Enrolment in the after-service health insurance programme is not automatic. Application for enrolment must be made within 31 days before or 31 days after the date of separation”.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Rodriguez Santorum
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type