91Â鶹ÌìÃÀ

UNDT/2023/114, Irambona

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application is denied.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The implied decision to refer allegations of theft, of which the Applicant was accused, to Burundian national authorities; the implied decision to waive the Applicant's immunity in relation to the theft case of which the Applicant was accused; (c) the decision to retain monies paid by the Applicant to the United Nations in relation to a theft which has not been investigated and in relation to which no disciplinary finding was ever made; and (d) the decision not to pay the Applicant's last month’s salary and separation entitlements

Legal Principle(s)

ST/AI/2017/1, paragraph 9.5 states, inter alia, that “[t]he Under-Secretary-General may then decide to recover, in part or in full, any financial loss suffered by the Organization pursuant to staff rule 10.1 (b). Staff rule 10.1(b), in turn, says that “the staff member may be required to reimburse the United Nations either partially or in full for any financial loss suffered by the United Nations as a result of the staff member’s conduct.â€

ST/AI/2017/1, paragraph 9.6 states, “the Under-Secretary-General for Management may decide to withhold the estimated financial loss suffered by the Organization from the staff member’s final separation entitlements.â€

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.